Saturday, 12 March 2011

Time for the media to stop using ‘the J word’

When Ian O’Doherty published his "I hate junkies" piece in the Irish Independent calling for cash incentives for the sterilisation of people experiencing problems with drugs, he probably didn’t realise that in a globalised world, ‘junkies’ and their allies are increasingly standing up to the use of lazy, pejorative, stereotypes in the media that simplify complex social problems and scapegoat some of the most marginalised and vulnerable members of society. For example, people routinely think of people who use drugs as a cause of crime, yet  they are frequently victims of violence and property crime; however, this is rarely acknowledged in the media.

In response to O’Doherty, members of the International Network of People who Use Drugs (INPUD) coordinated a letter writing and press complaints campaign that drew in dozens of letters from people who use drugs and other activists around the world.

Besmirching Ireland’s great literary tradition, O’Doherty drew further contempt when he argued that his piece was ‘satire’ and the Independent has since removed his article from its online edition. Furthermore they only published a very small number of responses from professionals including this from doctors across more than 30 countries. Their publication policy concealed the extent to which people who use drugs and are ‘out’ responded with a combination of dignity and wit – contradicting the idea that years using heroin and the like makes you sub-human. Kevin Jaffray* especially amused me when he signed off his letter "Yours truly, K. Jaffray (worthless junkie scumbag)". Many of these letters were, nevertheless, copied to a quasi-public space, which meant that this publication bias became evident to many activists.

The parallels aren’t perfect, but  the rise of INPUD resonates with campaigns for gay rights and an evolving process in which the affected population challenges injustice directly through a growing number of activists who overcome stigma and discrimination to ‘come out’. In its short lifetime, INPUD has already achieved official recognition and representation at a number of international and regional UN and other bodies, ensuring that the voices of people who inject and other people who use drugs contribute directly to the debates that affect their lives.

It has been common to hear that “Junkies could never organise anything.” Well, actually it seems they can. So please don’t use ‘the J word’ to talk about drug users in the media any more than you might use ‘the N word’ when talking about race. As if you do, someone might write you a letter and embarrass you about your casual contempt for a group of your fellow human beings and you could end up looking as silly as Ian O'Doherty.

*Kevin has of course agreed to me quoting him here.

Saturday, 30 October 2010

A DC comic morality tale for the iPod era?


I had this comic in 1971 (Amazing New Adventures of Superman #236) and it is one of the few story lines that stuck in my head. The original comic got thrown away during one of the occasional, catastrophic  tidy ups of my bedroom, but I am now so old and rich that I can lavish 100 times the original price (5p) in order to satisfy this nostalgic whim and I just have. And I'm glad I did too, because it seems just as astonishingly prescient as I had remembered.

So, what's so special about this story?

  • A population that is bewitched by the music of the Surrus flower to such an extent that the wander around with the flowers stuck to their ears and listen to nothing else
  • Looming environmental disaster that they have only a narrow opportunity to avert
  • Mass distrust/denial of science (Dr Mo-De's warnings fell on deaf ears)
Can you see where I'm going with this? 

Denny O'Neil wrote this in 1971. Never mind the iPod, the Sony Walkman was not invented until seven years later and the term global warming was not coined until 1975 (Wallace Broecker, "Climatic Change: Are We on the Brink of a Pronounced Global Warming?" Science, vol. 189 (8 August 1975), 460-463.) Mind you, he was a bit off the mark with his fashion predictions wasn't he? I love old Gregory Peck there with his hippy head band and Star Trek costume. Probably jeans worn with a waist band 18 inches from the ground were beyond O'Neil's imagination and I'm not going to criticise him for that.

And the moral of this story? I don't know what lessons you'll take from it, but for me it is clear.  

If I had only hoarded this away for 39 years I could have saved a fiver.


Wednesday, 27 October 2010

Planned obsolescence

UPDATE - It turns out that I can rename my blog so I have changed it from 'This is England 2010' to 'This is England', being as how it is 2011 and I'm still finding things to say...
---
I just responded to someone else's blog for the first time in my life, but had to keep on trimming my words down as I exceeded the word limit for comments. I've taken that as a clue that I should start a blog of my own rather than creating one in other people's comments boxes. So if you are reading this piffle, blame Kathryn Daley who has written very intelligently (i.e. I agree with her) about guys, girls and friendship.

As soon as I chose it, I realised that putting the year in the name of your blog is probably rather dumb. On the other hand, I am in England, it's 2010 and after finishing watching Shane Meadows' devastatingly gruelling but outrageously good four part TV serialisation This is England 86 yesterday evening, a tribute seems appropriate. 

So beyond being a tribute to Meadow's extraordinary ability to portray English working class culture, I'll pretend this is planned obsolescence and that this blog is just a test to enable me to learn about the practicalities of blogging here. 

And if I'm still writing this blog in England 2058. Well, frankly, I'll be surprised as I'll be a 100 years old, which will make me a centenarian, unless I can get a hat like this...


...which would make me a centenarian centurion and the envy of every pensioner in the queue at Eccles' Post Office.